Extraneous
Variable Missing in Clinical Studies
Dr.
McLaughlin did scientific studies using Paw Paw for the cancer of laboratory
animals. Paw Paw was very effective in arresting these cancers of laboratory
animals. Dr. McLaughlin stated that Paw Paw was almost a million times stronger
than Adriamycin for cancer. He stayed in my home when we brought him out on
tour and so I got to know him personally.
A clinical study was then done by Dr. Forsythe, an oncologist in Reno,
Nevada which involved more than 130 patients.
Patient
#3 reduced his tumor size from to the point that it was no longer detectable.
Patient
#8 After 7 months of using Paw Paw 14 tumors on the lymph nodes were no longer
detectable and the patient was considered cancer free.
Patient
#12 had stage 4 breast cancer. After using Paw Paw for 6 weeks the tumor
markers reduced from 160 to 80.
Patient
#52 ; non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma . After 35 days of sue the high white blood cell
count dropped from 34,000 to 12,000. The lymphocyte count dropped from 67% to
30% well within the normal range.
Anna ,
a patient with stage 4 breast cancer,
saw a tumor marker reduction of 50%
Ed
with stage 4 lung cancer used Paw Paw for 2 months and the tumor marker
decreased and he was able to walk again.
Byron
with stage 4 prostate cancer reduced his tumor size by 25% within 6 weeks.
Note
there were 130 patients and the report I received only accounted for 8
patients. Eight patients got marvelous results. What about the other 122
patients?
Why is
it that clinical studies using Paw Paw for these 122 cancer patients not get
the same results as that demonstrated by the animal studies where the results
were 100% effective? The answer lies in
extraneous variables. The variables in the clinical studies were not all
controlled! What are extraneous variables? “They are those factors in the
research environment which may have an effect on the dependent variable ( in
this case Paw Paw) but which are not controlled. Extraneous variables are
dangerous. They may damage a study's validity, making it impossible to know
whether the effects were caused by the independent and moderator variables or
some extraneous factor. If they cannot be controlled, extraneous variables must
at least be taken into consideration when interpreting results.” So think about little lab mice and the
variables I am referring to. Do they eat the amount of sugar that we as humans
consume? Here is a shocking stat for you. “Today the average American consumes
176 pounds of sugar per year!” That’s 1000% more sugar than 100 years ago. Do
those little animals take all those antibiotics that humans do? Do they drink
mounds of pop that humans do? How about 57 gallons of soda pop per person per
year on the average! Do those little critters have root canals as humans do?
Have they had all those vaccination shots containing foreign proteins, sick
animal pus, formaldehyde, all those toxic heavy metals injected into their bodies as we inject into
our bodies? You start to see that those extraneous variables are all part of
our human makeup that are not controlled in a clinical study:
Sugar
consumption
Pop
consumption
Antibiotics
Vaccinations
Root
canals and mercury fillings.
Now
let’s see what happens when one of my clients decides to take on the Paw Paw
program.
What do I do when I work with clients that are working to
overcome cancer? I identify the sources of their inflammation. In other words,
I identify the extraneous variables and bring this to the attention of my
clients so that they can work on eradicating as many poisons from the body as
possible. In other words I try to control as many extraneous variables that I
can. Now many times I do not always get the cooperation of the client. One
cancer client with cancer had root canals and when I asked him to address his
root canals, which was by the way many times, his response was, “This is not
going to happen.” He then decided that my program was not effective and that my
work was not worthy so off he went to a very expensive cancer retreat center.
The end result of that story is that he died. Of course that ultimate
experience for his family was that he tried the Paw Paw program and it did not
work. What the family failed to realize is that part of the Paw Paw program is
to address the inflammation, those toxic root canals, and in science these are
called extraneous variable. So you guessed it the tumor is now that the Paw
Paw program does not work!
That same year one lady with cancer of the throat was told
to address her toxic root canals. She went to 3 dentists who refused to extract
them because with their diagnosis there was nothing wrong with the root canals.
They all failed to realize that a root canal is a dead tooth. It is the law of
Nature that tells us when once something is alive that has oxygen flowing
through it and then it dies Nature automatically activates microbes in that
dead thing to break it down. That is the job of those microbes is to break dead
matter up. Sometimes this process is called decaying. Well if it is a dead crow
on the lawn than the decaying matter simply goes back into the Earth. But where
does the decaying matter of a dead root canal go? It goes right into the flow
systems of your body ; the blood stream and the lymphatic system. The
consequence of this action means the energy of the immune system must
constantly clean up the decaying matter of this root canal. Eventually the
immune system is overloaded and microbial infestation is constantly happening
in your body. The blood becomes a cesspool of waste debris. This lady in her
very vulnerable state was not able to be strong enough to tell the dentist to
extract her root canals and she died. The two people I am referring to did not
do TAFYH where the course teaches you to discover your own sources of inflammation
and to take action.
So let me tell you about another critical variable. And it
is our own personal preconceived ideas, our programmed belief system often
based on dogma. When a false idea is presented to us enough times we eventually
start to believe it. So I am going to quote a physicist
“The very expression “scientifically proven” is a
contradiction in terms. There’s nothing that is scientifically proven. The core
of science is the deep awareness that we have wrong ideas, we have prejudices. We
have ingrained prejudices. In our conceptual structure for grasping reality,
there might be something not appropriate, something we may have to revise to
understand better.
"[Science] has nothing to do with the assembling of
data and the ways of organizing the assembly of data. It has everything to do
with the way we think, and with our mental vision of the world." A
Physicist
We have all experienced the changes in scientific data. I
recall the scientific studies that were presented to the world in the 1950’s
that Thalidomide was a great drug for settling nausea in expectant Mothers.
This drug was proven to be safe and effective. The outcome of this drug was
that babies were born without limbs and many mothers miscarried their babies as
a result of this drug. Then suddenly this so called very safe and effective
drug was removed from the market.
From the Globe and Mail: Vioxx, a drug, was prescribed by
physicians for arthritis and chronic or acute pain. FDA originally approved
Vioxx in May 1999. Scientific safety studies included approximately 5000
patients on Vioxx which showed no increased risk of heart attack or
stroke.Vioxx was tested and proven safe but then it was pulled off the market!
Why? Because of Increased Risk of Heart Attack and Stroke. In 2004 VIOXX was
pulled off the market world-wide. “David Graham, associate director of science
for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Office of Drug Safety has estimated
that Vioxx killed some 60,000 patients--as many people, he points out, as died
in the Vietnam War.”
Once again, I ask how accurate is science? You can now
clearly see why I question science. I choose, instead to follow the Laws of
Nature.
